Sunday, April 03, 2011

Whoever's Behind This Haunting Will Have a Long Chat With Mother Superior...

It is incredible what you can find during an afternoon at your local library. After my recent review of William DeAndrea’s Killed on the Ice, when I found myself at my library, I couldn’t resist looking at the shelf to see if there were more DeAndreas, even though I knew there weren’t (thanks to the magic of the Internet). When I started to walk away towards the door, something caught my eye, and I stopped at the next shelf. A hardcover book with an altogether too-familiar spine was sitting there on the shelf—it was a Black Dagger Crime edition of Too Many Ghosts, by Paul Gallico (best-known, perhaps, as the author of The Poseidon Adventure, which made for an unreasonably delightful movie).

I really like the way old Dell Mapback editions would start out, by telling you what the book would be about, listing the most intriguing-sounding things about the plot. I will try to do the same. 


Too Many Ghosts is a Mystery about… a series of HAUNTINGS at Paradine Hall… an ICY hand GRABBING a girl’s throat… objects FLYING through the air UNAIDED… the dematerializing FIGURE of a nun… a HARP that plays by ITSELF in a locked ROOM…

And really, let’s be honest here: who wouldn’t want to read a mystery about a dematerializing nun?

Gallico never really hit it off with critics. They loved him for his story The Snow Goose (unread by me), but apart from that, he never really got anywhere with the critics. From what I can discern, Too Many Ghosts is his only entry into the mystery genre, and it’s a pretty damn good one at that. In just his first two chapters, Gallico introduces more impossible situations than some full-length novels ever get around to! He really complicates things for himself, but at the same time, there’s an uneasy feeling of “oh, is he going to just blame it all on trapdoors?”…

This novel is competently written. The first impossible manifestation of the supernatural is a pretty creepy scenario, but Gallico doesn’t really make it sound creepy, although it seems like he’s trying. He has far more success at a very creepy scene at a dinner table, where a chair suddenly begins to move by its own will, all the candles suddenly go out, and the figure of a nun materializes out of nowhere. It’s well-done, but Gallico never really makes this a spooky haunted-house story. He has fun with the premise and turns it into more of a supernatural-mystery-comedy.

The story has got excellent elements. Unfortunately, Gallico never tells a good story to connect the apparition of the nun with the harp that plays by itself. You’d think that it would make for a cool, creepy story! But you’d be wrong. Gallico blazes through it so fast in half a page, that if you blinked, you would miss it. If I wrote it all down, you’d think I was summarizing it. I would have loved to see his story written by John Dickson Carr, with a touch of blood and thunder, perhaps some of the grotesque or bizarre, and maybe going more into detail about the nun’s appearances in the past. There’s actually a really good ominous rhyme that could’ve been used to conclude such a story: “When the harp strings quiver and you hear the ghostly air, let the Paradines beware! Let the Paradines beware!

Gallico tells a satisfying story. Not all of his explanations are perfect— in particular, he does not play fair with the first ghost he debunks. “A-ha!” his detective, Alexander Hero, suddenly shouts to the reader. “Fifty pages ago I visited the office of Messrs. Smith, Wesson, and Smith, and I never told you what I discovered there! Well, it may interest you to know that the windows of Dame Blueberry's room were made entirely out of sugar!!! Doesn’t that explain the first ghost?” All right, I’m exaggerating, it was nothing nearly as silly and the explanation itself is quite satisfying, but Hero conveniently waits quite a few pages before telling the reader just what he learned. Some of his explanations are somewhat lacking, but generally, he explains his situations well.

The big cherry on top of this dessert, however, is the impossible situation Gallico creates with the harp that plays by itself. This is a really good situation: the door is locked, and when it is finally opened, there is nobody in the room, but the strings of the harp are still vibrating… The solution is actually pretty damn good, and is fair. It also manages to show some originality.

It must also be mentioned that Gallico is never mean-spirited: he doesn’t take sides and doesn’t condemn anyone for their beliefs. For instance, when Alexander Hero first arrives on scene, the local vicar is all set to perform an exorcism. Instead of launching into a tirade over how the priest knows nothing, Hero shows respect towards him and does not object to the ceremony, even though he’d prefer to have made a preliminary examination.

Hero is actually a very fun character. He treats everyone nicely, including the ugly child of a nasty bully of a politician and his neurotic wife. When he makes someone break down and cry, he feels awful. But above all, he wants to believe in the supernatural and paranormal, but as he himself says, “up to now, ghosts have been noticeably shy in my presence.”

Overall, this isn’t the best mystery ever written, but it’s certainly a fun one, and far from the worst. It’s fairly original and contains one good, interesting variation on the locked-room problem. Approach it more as a light-hearted ghost story, and you’ll probably walk away entertained. Once again, a post-Golden Age author (this was published in 1961) has proven to me that imagination did not completely die out with the Golden Age.

8 comments:

  1. If the locked room, involving the self-playing harp, is as interesting and competently explained as you say it is, I'm really nonplussed about it's non-existent status as an impossible crime novel.

    Why would it be completely ignored? I can understand the critics, but even the locked room enthusiasts? I guess you really stumbled across a forgotten book that would be perfect for Fridays. ;D

    Anyway, expect a review up on my blog when I’ve finished the book.

    ReplyDelete
  2. It's something that I suppose was somehow lost in the sands of time- rather like The Anagram Detectives, which I discovered by looking through the bibliography in Doug Greene's biography of Carr- it included the many parodies. Prior to that, I'd never heard of Schier, "Hocus Pocus at the Drumis Tree", or that it was printed in something other than EQMM.

    Ah, those lost gems... such a wonderful feeling when you find them...

    Of course, you're cheating. You have The Anthony Boucher Chronicles at your disposal. It isn't even available for ILL here...

    I will keep an eye out for your review. Let's see just how much we agree, and perhaps next time, we can work on one of these posts together...

    ReplyDelete
  3. I'm still "patiently" waiting for my copy of The Anagram Detectives to arrive, which, unfortunately, will take its sweet time getting here, but I will definitely let you know when I hold it in my greedy paws as a collaborative effort sounds like lots of fun - especially with this book. Not to mention that Schief would be a perfect addition to your other reviews of post-GAD era authors. ;D

    And I don't try to thumb too often through the Boucher book; it gives me the itch, if you know what I mean.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Well, to get the Boucher book, I'd have to spend $40 to be able to spend countless more... So I don't think I'm in any danger for now...

    ReplyDelete
  5. I think the Boucher book isn't available to libraries has something to do with it being published by a small, specialized print-on-demand publishing house – which is ludicrous, when you think about it.

    The book contains a wealth of information, relevant to both researchers and scholars. You know, the kind of people who frequent libraries in search of information.

    But to come back to Too Many Ghosts, I ventured a bit further into the book, but not as far as I would like, which I blame entirely on my social obligations to society.

    Our "friend" Nigel is also bugging me that the book should be filmed as a musical and star Michael Jackson as Alexander Hero (reminiscent to his video clips Thriller and Ghosts, but than a lot longer), and when I told him that Michael Jackson died a few years ago he become even more enthusiastic, "'Cause who wouldn’t want to see a singing, dancing zombie exorcising old British country houses? It will appeal to different demographics! A guaranteed box office hit, my friend!"

    I hate Nigel! :/

    ReplyDelete
  6. Yes, but did he hire the screenwriter I wanted? Oh, the fellow is useless...

    But I love Boucher, even if my experience with him has so far been limited to the Sherlock Holmes radio plays. It's why, like I posted on the forum, I started on Nine Times Nine.

    ReplyDelete
  7. No, he's been bugging Stephenie Meyer to do the screenplay, because she knows how to write and market stories about supernatural creatures.

    ReplyDelete

Due to a recent resurgence in spam messages, I have disabled anonymous commenting. I realize this may be annoying to some users who do not wish to sign up for a Google account, but this is the easiest way for me to deal with spam and still have comments appear in a timely manner.

Please keep all discussion civil.