Although The Case of the Late Pig has points of interest, I’m not entirely convinced it is a great starting point for newcomers to Margery Allingham. It is an enjoyable read, and in many ways a black comedy. It is a remarkably short book, barely over short story length. The edition I have is a 138-page Penguin. So the book practically flies by, and it’s amusing and so on. So what’s wrong with it?
However, the plot is a fun one, as Albert Campion begins the story by attending the funeral of an old school chum. Well, perhaps “chum” isn’t quite the word. Pig Peters was a notorious bully back in the good old days at school: “Pig Peters was a major evil in our lives at that time. He ranked with Injustice, The Devil, and Latin Prose.” Not surprisingly, nobody is really broken up about his passing, and his funeral has a really low turnout rate.
Campion forgets about the whole event, but months later, he is summoned back to the village where Pig’s funeral takes place. See, there’s been a murder, and as it turns out, the victim is none other than Pig Peters! But how has Pig pulled off this miracle, and managed to die twice? It’s an impossible crime… sort of. Allingham really misses an opportunity to drive home an impossible crime aspect. Later, when Pig’s body disappears out of a locked cottage used as a temporary morgue, Allingham misses a second opportunity to use an impossible crime. Maybe it’s just as well. Considered as an impossible crime story, both the situations really are lacking. Overall, the story is enjoyable, although some editions give away a major revelation on the cover.
The culprit is actually really easy to spot, and the method isn’t particularly interesting. There are elements of cleverness in the solution, such as why the murderer chose to strike when he or she did, but for the most part, it’s merely O.K.
I enjoyed Allingham’s writing style. She seemed to have a nice sense of humour; note, for instance, her description of a nondescript person:
“”I don’t know what he looks like, except that he presumably has a face, since it would be an omission that I should have been certain to observe.”
I found that rather humorous, as Allingham, not content with the usual bland/nondescript/forgettable route for descriptions of this sort, comes up with a unique way of describing such a person.
However, I suspect I would have enjoyed this book more if I had more of an idea what was going on with Campion & Co. As I was entirely unfamiliar with the series, starting with an unconventional book that uses its detective as the narrator was probably a mistake. There were times where I wondered if Janet had been in an earlier novel (and if so, what was the backstory there), or who the devil Leo was anyways.
Overall, it’s a quick, humorous, and enjoyable read— but it was undoubtedly the wrong book with which to start reading Allingham.
I'm not the most qualified person to comment on Margery Allingham's books, gave up on her after five books or so, but there's not really a title that you could call characteristically hers. She nearly always tried a different approach in each book.
ReplyDeleteI really wish I could warm up to her books, but I thoroughly disliked all of them.
However, she had a flair for coming up with intriguing book titles. Sadly, the same can't be said about you. ;)
Did she really? Well, that's good to know. I really enjoyed her sense of humour but to be honest, I felt lost when it came to Campion, Lugg, & Co, wondering what was the backstory everywhere.
ReplyDeleteI agree with the book titles- "Death of a Ghost" and "Police at the Funeral" sound particularly awesome. But, come on! I thought my sneaky reference to a favourite Ellery Queen was at least passable! ;)
I have read the first novels of Allingham, up to "Police at the Funeral" and I found them funny at times but mildly interesting overall.But I was told that the quality of her works improved greatly in the late 1930s and after, so I will give her a second chance. Many consider that "The case of the late pig" is one of her best novels.An adaptation has been made by the BBC in 1989,but,having not seen it, I can't say if it is faithful to the book.
ReplyDelete