Devoted readers of this blog (all three of them) might
remember a review I did back in April of John Curran’s Agatha
Christie’s Secret Notebooks. I concluded the review by warning readers
to keep an eye out for a review of the sequel, Agatha Christie’s Murder in the Making. Well, it’s been almost two
months now, which for me is probably a record time.
Despite all the recent Batman reviews
and a very
negative Ellery Queen review, I remain a devoted fan of the traditional
puzzle-plot mystery, and one of its greatest practitioners was Agatha Christie.
Indeed, until I discovered John Dickson Carr I considered Agatha the greatest. Which is why I was very
interested in John Curran’s two books, examining the notebooks that Agatha
Christie left behind. Agatha Christie’s
Murder in the Making is his second
volume and contains much of the material that was left out of the first book, Agatha Christie’s Secret Notebooks.
In this second volume we get a closer look at some of Dame
Agatha’s novels, particularly those left out of the first books. Of particular
interest is the original draft of the final chapter of The Mysterious Affair at Styles. There are also discussions about
some of Christie’s best books, including the brilliant After the Funeral, The Body
in the Library, and Curtain: Poirot’s
Last Case. There’s also an alternate (and in my opinion, far superior)
version of the Miss Marple short story The
Case of the Caretaker (here, The Case
of the Caretaker’s Wife). And wonder of all wonders, one of Christie’s
earliest short stories also (re)surfaces!
As was the case with the first book, Mr. Curran does an
admirable job looking through Christie’s notebooks and giving some fine insight
into her creative processes. This makes for a wonderfully entertaining read,
and the preface in which he reconstructs the birth of an idea is quite simply
remarkable. But a big plus is the classification system. In Agatha Christie’s Secret Notebooks, books
were discussed under “themes” but because one book could fit into multiple
categories, it made the entries somewhat confusing at times. Now, in Murder
in the Making, John Curran decides to adopt a chronological approach, which
makes everything flow far more smoothly.
This comes at a disadvantage, however, in that it leaves the
last decade of Christie’s life as the concluding note of the book. What an anticlimactic
way to conclude such a fine survey: analyses of those monstrosities, Passenger to Frankfurt and Postern of Fate! But wait! John Curran
works his way out of this corner brilliantly. Throughout the book he has
strategically placed sections of “unused ideas” Christie could never get around
to. (These include the glorious idea of Christie writing a Cluedo-based novel!) But after the analysis of Postern of Fate, Curran pulls out his best card and he places it in
on the table: an idea Christie began to toy with but could never flesh out into
novel form. It’s a genuine shame: it shows Christie’s imagination never dried
out and that up until the end she was her devilishly ingenious, creative self.
The idea is far more psychological in approach, something that you’d expect
from Margaret Millar— but Christie had several interesting ideas about where
the plot could go, and one of them contains all the flash of the Christie of
yesteryear. It’s a bit of a bittersweet ending to the book, but it leaves you
remembering Christie the brilliant mastermind and fiendish plotter.
Although the wording may sound a trite cliché, if you liked Agatha Christie’s Secret Notebooks you’ll
love Agatha Christie’s Murder in the
Making. The material is better organized and just as interesting, and the unused
ideas are all fascinating, especially the final one. The critical analysis is
always honest and fair, and as a reference tool, it is invaluable to the
Christie fan. Considered as a single volume with its predecessor, it really is
the finest book on Christie that I have read since Robert Barnard’s A Talent to Deceive.
Note: I had the great honour of being able to interview John Curran himself yesterday! I'm busily editing the interview at the moment but once it is all done I will proudly share it all with you on this blog! Stay tuned, and don't fear-- "soon" in this context will not mean two months!
Note: I had the great honour of being able to interview John Curran himself yesterday! I'm busily editing the interview at the moment but once it is all done I will proudly share it all with you on this blog! Stay tuned, and don't fear-- "soon" in this context will not mean two months!
Thanks for the review, Patrick, and I agree completely with your conclusions. I think this volume is better organized - and, as such, more readable - than the first one. The Marple story really is better than the published version, and it's fascinating to read so many of Christie's ideas and wonder what might have been, had she been able to write everything that she had considered. I look forward to your interview with Curran.
ReplyDeleteThanks for this, Patrick. I haven't been able to get to these and now you've made me even more eager.
ReplyDeleteI really must get round to getting these books - although I think I want to fill in a few little gaps in my Christie reading first in case this books spoils them. Of course, that would mean reading Postern of Fate...
ReplyDeleteWow! How did you meet Mr. Curran?
ReplyDeleteThanks for the enthusiastic response, everyone!
ReplyDelete@Les
I think more or less everyone agrees that it works better chronologically, but in the interview, Mr. Curran does a neat job explaining why he did it the way he did it in the first book.
@Bev
Happy to be of service in the good cause! ;)
@Puzzle Doctor
Actually, Curran places spoiler warnings at the start of the chapters to warn readers what solutions will be spoiled, though it's definitely not a bad idea to fill in the gaps first... especially if you've got gaps like AFTER THE FUNERAL to fill! (Although if PASSENGER TO FRANKFURT and POSTERN OF FATE are among those gaps, I would encourage you to leave them as gaps, especially FRANKFURT which is an incoherent mess.)
@Christopher
I contacted him through his website and when I pitched the idea of an interview to him, he was most kind and enthusiastic about the idea! I didn't even bother preparing too many questions because I had a feeling that with half a dozen "start up" questions we could easily talk for two hours-- and I was right!
This is great! Thanks so much for this!
ReplyDelete