“I am going to kill a
man. I don’t know his name, I don’t know where he lives, I have no idea what he
looks like. But I am going to find him and kill him …”
Thus begins the diary of Frank Cairnes, an author of
detective stories under the pseudonym Felix Lane. But this isn’t a notebook in
which he will set down the details of a fictional murder plot: he truly intends
to find a man and murder him. But what could prompt a sane man to turn to
murder?
It turns out Frank had a son named Martie, and a few months
ago he had gone into the village to buy some sweets. That was when he got run
over by a careless motorist; poor Martie never stood a chance. The police have
been unable to trace the motorist responsible for the death, and he never
stopped nor reported the accident. That man is the titular beast in Nicholas
Blake’s novel The Beast Must Die, and
when he is murdered, Cairnes’ journal is found and he immediately becomes the prime
suspect. But Nigel Strangeways isn’t convinced…
Nicholas Blake (pseudonym of Cecil Day-Lewis) was one of the
greatest writers to emerge during the Golden Age of Detective Fiction. Surely
even Edmund Wilson would concede this much—after all, he was the Poet Laureate
of the United Kingdom from 1968 until his death in 1972. So if I run across a
dry patch in 2013 where I keep reading bad books and start complaining about it,
someone needs to remind me of the happy times I spent reading books like this. The Beast Must Die is, quite frankly, my
idea of the perfect detective novel. It quite literally has everything you can
reasonably ask of an author. Excellent characters and atmosphere, some genuine
suspense, and terrific detection complete with a surprising ending! All this
can be found between the covers, and it’s a real treat, let me tell you.
Central to the book’s success is the character of Frank
Cairnes/Felix Lane. A detective story author by trade, Cairnes attempts to do
what the police failed to do by finding his son’s murderer. True, he is aided
in his quest by a smattering of luck, but he also makes some clever deductions
until he finally finds his prey. Only when he does find his prey, George Rattery, he discovers that he is quite
literally a beast. Rattery poisons the lives of those who surround him. He
makes his wife’s life miserable and he takes sadistic pleasure in
psychologically tormenting his son. Briefly put, the man has no redeeming
qualities whatsoever, and so when Cairnes sets out to murder him, you feel
sympathetic to his cause.
One of the most fascinating aspects of this character is his
duality, however. In order to get close to Rattery (so as to precipitate his
death), Cairnes goes undercover as Felix Lane, the detective story writer. He
hides behind this pseudonym and begins to live a double life in order to
properly establish Felix Lane’s fictional biography. He manipulates people he
meets as Lane to further his murderous schemes, but the feelings he develops as
Lane sink through the façade and resurface when he once again becomes Frank
Cairnes. I don’t want to say too much more, but this theme plays a fairly
prominent part in the events of the novel without being intrusive or
self-consciously literary. If you read this novel for yourself you will see
this aspect of Cairnes’ character develop throughout the novel, and it really
makes for fascinating reading.
However, as terrific as the characters are, Nicholas Blake’s
plot steals the show. This is plotting at its finest. Clues and red herrings
abound and it really takes a lot of sifting to figure out whether any given
piece of evidence is a genuine clue or an engineered red herring. All is
explained in the end, with a genuinely surprising twist ending. I genuinely was
not expecting the murderer to be who it was, and not too many authors can take
me aback like Nicholas Blake did in this one. It’s a fine plot and it shows you
that a good story does not automatically exclude good characters and atmosphere
(unlike what critics in the Julian Symons/P.D. James vein would have you
believe).
In fact, that is in many ways why The Beast Must Die is so damn brilliant. I spent a lot of time
talking about character rather than plot, but that’s because in this book, the plot
emerges from character. Their complexity is what fuels the story on. We
discover more and more about these characters, and because of this the plot
moves forward. Too many authors these days forget that such a thing is even
possible. Many will spend so much time developing characters that by the end of
the book the plot has yet to commence. Nicholas Blake achieves a fine balance,
however, and many of the scenes that develop characters also help to develop
the plot further. It’s a rare talent to possess, and that alone makes The Beast Must Die one of the all-time
great detective novels.
Note: I
discovered, to my pleasure, that many Nicholas Blake titles are now available
as Audiobooks on Audible. However, that pleasure quickly disappeared. If you
value your sanity, stay away from these audiobooks. The Beast Must Die is a brilliant novel, and it was
assigned the worst audiobook reader I’ve come across since Davina Porter read An Unsuitable Job for a Woman. Here... is
a... sam-ple... of the kind of aw-kward... enunci-a-tion... and… pauses… you get throughout, complete
with absolutely bizarre… em-phasis… that
adds nothing... to the reading and
really only serves as... abrupt… in-terruptions...
The reader is one Kris Dyer, and he pissed me off so much that I turned the
blasted thing off well before the halfway mark of the book. I had no intention
of having it ruined for me. It sounds like the reader is either a wannabe Gary
Oldman, or he came to the job high on some sort of experimental drug. So if you
value your sanity, please please please
stay away from these audiobooks: I’ve suffered enough pain for both our lifetimes,
whoever you are.
I've never read the book, but I enjoyed the movie. It's French! It's Chabrol! How can anyone not love it? Find a copy and watch it soon, Patrick. Slightly different from the book, but rather good all the same.
ReplyDeleteI had to look up Kris Dyer and discovered he's a radio actor and scriptwriter. And judging by his bio rather full of himself. He's primarily a comedy writer and comic actor which probably explains the deadly dull seriousness in his audio book narration. But it could be blamed on a very bad director, too.
I have heard good things about it, and I do like Chabrol. I'll just have to find an opportunity in a few weeks (since until the 22nd, my primary activity is studying).
DeleteI've read this one a few years ago and liked it plenty, for a character/psychology-driven detective story it's pretty good, but have always disagreed with the general opinion that it’s Blake's masterpiece. Head of a Traveller is a much better novel and A Question of Proof a superior mystery. It’s his most well known work, but certainly not his best.
ReplyDeleteBut surely you agree that it *is* a masterpiece? It's my second Blake after THOU SHELL OF DEATH and the detective story is a major improvement, but once again the character complexity is positively brilliant and helps move the plot forward.
DeleteOh, obsolutely, but it's similar to comparing the best works of Carr and Christie with their good ones, which are only considered "good" because the other stuff is even more amazing. I know that Blake is not considered on the be same league as those two, and I agree, but as of yet I have not encountered a Blake mystery that I didn't like (even if the plot was a trifle weak) - so I think the comparison for me personally is not entirely off.
DeleteYou know, I just night return to Nigel Strangeways this month.
Terrific review Patrick - this is easily one of Blake's best books and I agree with John, the movie version (which, while faithful, jettisons Strangways incidentally) works extremely well on its own terms.
ReplyDeleteWell, thanks to both of you I now have a copy of the film. I hope you're satisfied. ;)
DeleteI read this one many years ago and was equally impressed by Blake's skill at characterization. One of these days I may have to get another copy and reread it.
ReplyDeleteA friend recommended Blake's A PRIVATE WOUND, a standalone, and I think it's one you'd like, Patrick. Once again characterization drives the story, and I recall it as being a hard-to-put-down novel.
Barry, thanks for the tip. It's only my second Blake and so I like getting recommendations from more experienced readers to help guide my next reading choices.
DeleteWonderful,wonderful book. Read it a few years back, and afterwards wondered why Blake is a semi-forgotten crime author. The mixture of character and plot is perfect, and I've been trying to dig up more Blake titles.
ReplyDeleteI don't understand it myself, but I also don't understand the disappearance of Carr, Rhode, Queen, Rice, McCloy, Innes, Quentin, and Armstrong!!!
DeletePS I was of course initially thinking this was going to be a Gilbert Adair review ...
ReplyDeleteI'm afraid, Sergio, that that's still a closed book... ;)
DeleteI am sorry Patrick but I have to disagree. The book has one of the most brilliant openings ever but mid-way through - when the narrative changes from the recorded entries to the present - it lost its steam. The detective also did not do much to me. But in fact, my main grouse was the characterisation. Shouldn't Lane have been filled with self-loathing for having fallen in love with Lena? We do not see that aspect at all.
ReplyDeleteHere's my brief write-up if you are interested:
http://inkquilletc.blogspot.in/2012/04/review-beast-must-die.html
Rattery sends Cairnes' diary to Rattery's solicitor, a fact which Cairnes records in his diary. This bit of impossibility spoiled the story for me.
ReplyDelete