Earlier this year, I reviewed a string of
Holmesian pastiches, which is when I got very annoyed at a recurring plot
element. It seems that many pastiche writers go for the cliché plot element
where they “kill” Holmes for one scene, have Watson mourn his tragic death, and
bring him back twenty or thirty pages later. This got so annoying that when I
was reviewing Loren D. Estleman’s first-rate Sherlock Holmes vs. Dracula, I ended up writing the following:
Basically, I’ve gotten very tired of sitting through Holmes’ death over and over again, and only to see him come back. It’s not like I hate Holmes – I love the character – but it’d be refreshing if someone killed Holmes off and just left him dead.
Those words have come back to haunt me.
Because as it turns out, there is a gentleman out there named Michael Dibdin
who wrote The Last Sherlock Holmes Story.
And ooooooooh boy, it’s definitely
the last Sherlock Holmes story. I won’t say why it’s the last one, but I will
say this much: Dibdin’s revisions to the Canon are so drastic that they make
Nicholas Meyer’s The Seven Per-Cent
Solution look like a faithful follow-up.
Fortunately, Dibdin’s revisions are not of the
“Oh, I’m just too clever, aren’t I? Probably better than Conan Doyle!” variety. These are some genuinely fantastic and intriguing ideas,
intelligently backed by the Canon. Although I found the ending a bit on the
weak side, with Dr. Watson being phenomenally stupid, Watson offers a decent
defense of his stupidity and makes it seem plausible. It’s also a very good instalment
in Holmes vs. Jack the Ripper lore, turning the infamous murders into a
fantastic prelude to The Final Problem.
That’s honestly all I dare reveal about the
plot and all you need to know going in. Holmes does battle against Jack the Ripper,
and this is my favourite kind of Jack the Ripper solution: it’s a solution that’ll
only work in fiction and doesn’t try to do anything else. Like René Reouven and
Elementary, My Dear Holmes, the
villain cast as Jack the Ripper couldn’t possibly be a suspect in real life. But
oftentimes, an author writing a Holmes vs. the Ripper story will try to make
their suspect a plausible culprit in real life and only succeeds in making the
fiction weaker. (Lyndsey Faye’s Dust and
Shadow ran into this problem.) But no, Michael Dibdin allows his
imagination to run wild and comes up with one of the most interesting Jack the
Ripper suspects I’ve ever read about. Is it the definitive Holmes vs. the
Ripper story? No, I still think that honour goes to Elementary, My Dear Holmes. But The
Last Sherlock Holmes Story stands its ground quite admirably.
The characters of Holmes and Watson are
very well drawn. Watson is fairly intelligent until his bout of stupidity near the
end, but as I’ve already said, he has a legitimate excuse. I liked seeing
Watson being smart, because that makes him more interesting company and it
makes Holmes’ brilliance seem all the more dazzling. Although Watson narrates
the story it sounds nothing like the Dr. Watson from the Canon. This too is
explained: it turns out that Arthur Conan Doyle was the author of the Holmes stories, and used Watson’s case notes
to construct them. This is a masterstroke on Dibdin’s behalf, but I really dare
not go into more detail here.
Holmes is essentially the same figure we
all know and love from Conan Doyle’s story. The brilliant mind is still there
and is still impatient at the stupidity of mere mortals. The excitement of the
chase is still there and he doesn’t back down from an intellectual puzzle. He
gets into a duel of wits with a master criminal, and it’s at these moments
where Holmes is at his finest.
That’s really all I can say about this
story. It quite simply took me aback. Michael Dibdin did something interesting,
original, clever, and creative with Sherlock Holmes. Shockingly enough, he
keeps his promise that this is The Last
Sherlock Holmes Story. It’s not a book that will appeal to every Holmesian,
but if you’re tired of seeing the same old clichés dressed up in different ways,
this is a refreshing book. It’s one of those books that reminds me just why I
fell in love with Holmes in the first place.
I know why it's the last Sherlock Holmes story. I have this and read it many years ago.
ReplyDeleteThis book got some pretty bad reviews in some quarters so glad to hear you thought much better of it - I did like Dibdin's books though stopped keeping up with hsi Aurelio Zen series long before his death as they got a bit repetitive for me (probably an Italian thing - not really much of a Donna Leon reader either).
ReplyDeleteI have never read the book, but I know the premise as it spoiled for me when I was reading up on it. I don't think I'll be reading this one anytime soon as it is just a bit too radical for my tastes. The premise may be original, but it's not my cup of tea. If you're still interested in a Holmes vs. the Ripper novel, I recommend "The Whitechapel Horrors" by Edward B. Hanna.
ReplyDeleteI was bothered by the ending; in fact, by the latter part of the book. There was some genuinely intriguing plotting and characterization upfront but the final fizzle left me feeling unsatisfied.
ReplyDeleteI had similar feelings about Nicholas Meyer's "Seven-Per-Cent Solution". Some great writing, clever plotting but a disappointing latter half of the novel.
I think I'd probably agree with you. If you go back to my review of "The Seven-Per-Cent Solution", you'll see that I was far more enthusiastic about the first part of the novel where Meyer pulls all the revisionist rabbits out of his hat. The mystery we're left with is obvious and not particularly interesting, but the journey we took to get there was so much fun that I still think it's an excellent read.
DeleteI had sort-of similar feelings about this book at first, but then I thought back and realized that I liked the fact that Dibdin took some risks. The ending requires Watson to be a complete moron, but he himself admits that it was not his finest hour, so I can forgive him. The overall result was far more interesting to me than reading yet another serious, 'credible' take on Holmes vs. the Ripper. ("Credibility" in these novels often serves only to make the fiction weaker.)
My biggest complaint about the book is that if I were going to buy what we are served up, then I would like to know just where the heck is Mycroft in this story? The character doesn't seem to exist in the novel and IMO Dibdin shouldn't have left him out.
ReplyDelete