Strangers on a Train
was Patricia Highsmith’s first published novel, and it was a smash hit. So big,
in fact, that a film adaptation was quickly made by the master of suspense
himself, Alfred Hitchcock. And the first script was written by Raymond Chandler
– although venom-filled “creative differences” between Hitch and Raymondo ended
up getting Chandler dismissed from the project. The final product is one of
Hitchcock’s finest thrillers. But how does the novel compare?
Fans of the film are warned that the book is very, very different from the film. I suspect that many of the
differences arose thanks to the Hollywood censors, but if that was the case I
can only say “Thank God!” When reviewing Francis Iles’ Before
the Fact, which became the film Suspicion,
I remarked that Hitchcock could take the silliest stories and turn them into
terrific thrillers. My batting average for books-that-become-Hitchcock-films is
very low right now: Strangers on a Train
is one of those silly stories. And I have no idea why it has such a high
reputation.
